Lawrence v. Colvin et al
Plaintiff: David John Lawrence
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Case Number: 0:2014cv03398
Filed: September 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Mille Lacs
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10 ] is DENIED. (2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 13 ] is GRANTED. (3) Defendant's decision is affirmed. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 18, 2015. (CBC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lawrence v. Colvin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David John Lawrence
Represented By: Carol Louise Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?