Merchant Advisory Group v. Merchants Advisory Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Merchant Advisory Group
Defendant: Merchants Advisory Group, LLC
Case Number: 0:2014cv03415
Filed: September 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1121
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 12 Motion for Default Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 12/09/2014. (TLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merchant Advisory Group v. Merchants Advisory Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merchants Advisory Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Merchant Advisory Group
Represented By: Robert Clary
Represented By: Barbara A Bagdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?