Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Regents of the University of Minnesota
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Case Number: 0:2014cv04666
Filed: November 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Tony N. Leung
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 741 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Lauren Kindler (542) and DENYING Defendants Motion to Exclude Testimony and Opinions of Dr. Matthew Lynde (592). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R Tunheim on 2/28/2024. Associated Cases: 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL(KKM)
February 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 740 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part (536) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (543) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (580) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (586) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 0: 14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL; granting in part and denying in part (568) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (574) Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying (599) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (614) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 0:14-cv-04669-JRT -TNL; granting in part and denying in part (556) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (562) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (572) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (574) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL; granting i n part and denying in part (587) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (593) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (626) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (628) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/23/2024. Associated Cases: 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL(HMA)
February 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 738 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING Defendants' Appeal/Objection (723) and AFFIRMING the Magistrate Judge's Decision (719). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/22/2024. Associated Cases: 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL(KKM)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 342 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 8/5/2022.Associated Cases: 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL(HMA)
January 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for (189 in 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL) Report and Recommendation, (158 in 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL) Motion for Discovery filed by Ericsson, Inc., Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , T-Mobile USA, Inc., (155 in 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL) Motion for Discovery filed by Ericsson, Inc., (167 in 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL) Motion for Discovery filed by Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Ericsson, Inc., Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., (206 in 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL) Report and Recommendation, (212 in 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL) Report and Recommendation, (164 in 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL) Motion for Discovery filed by Ericsson, Inc., Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Cellco Partnership, (213 in 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL) Report and Recommendation; denying defendants' motions to reduce asserted claims and adopting plaintiff's proposal (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on January 10, 2017. Associated Cases: 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL(HAZ)
September 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERM granting in part and denying in part (29) Motion to Dismiss in case 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL; granting in part and denying in part (38) Motion to Dismiss in case 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL; granti ng in part and denying in part (33) Motion to Dismiss in case 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL; granting in part and denying in part (31) Motion to Dismiss in case 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL. 1. Defendants' motions are granted without prejudice as to the Un iversity's willful blindness claims. 2. Defendants' motions are denied in all other respects.(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on September 29, 2015. Associated Cases: 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04669-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04671-JRT-TNL, 0:14-cv-04672-JRT-TNL(DML)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regents of the University of Minnesota
Represented By: Ann N Cathcart Chaplin
Represented By: William P Donohue
Represented By: David A Gerasimow
Represented By: Frank E Scherkenbach
Represented By: Tracy M Smith
Represented By: William R Woodford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Represented By: Barbara P Berens
Represented By: Justi R Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?