Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Lapadat

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Lapadat

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Lapadat

Plaintiff:	Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:	Heather Lapadat
Case Number:	0:2014cv04737
Filed:	November 12, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Franklin L. Noel
Presiding Judge:	Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 12, 2015	Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss/General. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT defendant's motion to dismiss 12 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. To the extent that plaintiff makes a claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 for use of its trademarks with respect to goods, defendant's motion is GRANTED and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. To the extent that plaintiff claims to be entitled to the remedy for counterfeiting provided und er 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(1), defendant's motion is GRANTED and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on August 12, 2015. (CLG)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 12, 2015

Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss/General. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT defendant's motion to dismiss 12 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. To the extent that plaintiff makes a claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 for use of its trademarks with respect to goods, defendant's motion is GRANTED and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. To the extent that plaintiff claims to be entitled to the remedy for counterfeiting provided und er 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(1), defendant's motion is GRANTED and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on August 12, 2015. (CLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Lapadat
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Represented By:	Jessica M Alm
Represented By:	David R Fairbairn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Heather Lapadat
Represented By:	Allen W Hinderaker
Represented By:	William D Schultz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?