Haggins v. Ramsey County et al
| DeJuan Haywood Haggins |
| Ramsey County, Scott Brommerich, C.O. Whipps, C.O. Reniteria, C.O. Frerichs and Sgt. Sontoya |
| 0:2015cv00059 |
| January 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Leo I. Brisbois |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez's January 30, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 162 ) is ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 123 ) is GRANTED. The Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 5 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/22/2019. (las)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Mendendez's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 119 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss as Discovery Sanction (Doc. No. 111 ) is DENIED WITHOUT P REJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 11/20/2017. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez's August 22, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 107 ) is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss As Discovery Sanction (Doc. No. 99 ) is DENIE D WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. The schedule is amended as set forth in the following paragraphs. a. The Defendants are granted a short extension of the discovery deadlines so that they can receive answers to their interrogatories and document requests, as provided for in subparagraph (e) below, and complete any appropriate follow-up discovery. Any such additional discovery by the Defendants shall be commenced in time to be completed within three months of the date of this Order. b. Non-dispositive mot ions must be served and filed by the same date as the close of fact discovery. c. Dispositive motions must be served and filed within two months after the close of fact discovery. d. The case must be ready for trial four months after the dispositive motion deadline. e. Within 21 days of receiving this Order, Mr. Haggins must fully respond to all of the Defendants' interrogatories and document requests to the best of his ability and recollection. Mr. Haggins may not interpose objections to t he written discovery that the Defendants have already served. Mr. Haggins is specifically cautioned that his failure to completely respond to the Defendants' written discovery requests will result in dismissal of his case. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/12/2017. (BJS) Modified text on 9/12/2017 (ACH). cc: Haggins
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
