Spineology, Inc. v Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court Spineology, Inc. v Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

Spineology, Inc. v Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Spineology, Inc.
Defendant:	Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Case Number:	0:2015cv00180
Filed:	January 28, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Ramsey
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 17, 2017	Filing 201 ORDER: Wright Medical Technology's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 [Docket No. 169 ] is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 17, 2017. (CBC)
July 25, 2017	Filing 164 ORDER: (1) Spineology's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 91 ] is DENIED. (2) Wright Medical Technology's Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Spineology, Inc.'s Expert, Mr. John Allen [Docket No. 97 ] is DENIED. (3) Wright Medical Technology's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Spineology, Inc.'s Expert, Dr. Robert Morgan [Docket No. 102 ] is DENIED. (4) Wright Medical Technology's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 107] is GRANTED. (5) Wright Medi cal Technology's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Spineology, Inc.'s Expert, Dr. Timothy Nantell [Docket No. 111 ] is DENIED. (6) Count I and Count II of Spineology's Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (7) Count I and Count II of Wright Medical Technology's counterclaims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (8) Claims 15, 21, 22, 23, and 35 of United States Reissued Patent No. RE42,757 are invalid. Count III of Wright Medical Technology's counterclaims is otherwise DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 25, 2017. (CBC)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 17, 2017

Filing 201 ORDER: Wright Medical Technology's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 [Docket No. 169 ] is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 17, 2017. (CBC)

July 25, 2017

Filing 164 ORDER: (1) Spineology's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 91 ] is DENIED. (2) Wright Medical Technology's Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Spineology, Inc.'s Expert, Mr. John Allen [Docket No. 97 ] is DENIED. (3) Wright Medical Technology's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Spineology, Inc.'s Expert, Dr. Robert Morgan [Docket No. 102 ] is DENIED. (4) Wright Medical Technology's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 107] is GRANTED. (5) Wright Medi cal Technology's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Spineology, Inc.'s Expert, Dr. Timothy Nantell [Docket No. 111 ] is DENIED. (6) Count I and Count II of Spineology's Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (7) Count I and Count II of Wright Medical Technology's counterclaims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (8) Claims 15, 21, 22, 23, and 35 of United States Reissued Patent No. RE42,757 are invalid. Count III of Wright Medical Technology's counterclaims is otherwise DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 25, 2017. (CBC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spineology, Inc. v Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Spineology, Inc.
Represented By:	Randall T Skaar
Represented By:	Scott G Ulbrich
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?