Daikin Applied Americas Inc. v. Kavlico Corporation
Plaintiff: Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
Defendant: Kavlico Corporation
Case Number: 0:2015cv01492
Filed: March 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Stay (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 06/11/2015. (TLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daikin Applied Americas Inc. v. Kavlico Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
Represented By: Roshan N Rajkumar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kavlico Corporation
Represented By: David P Graham
Represented By: Jared D Kemper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?