Lusk v. Life Time Fitness, Inc. et al
| Matthew Lusk |
| Life Time Fitness, Inc., Bahram Akradi, Giles H. Bateman, Jack W. Eugster, Guy C. Jackson, John K. Lloyd, Martha A. Morfitt, John B. Richards and Joseph S. Vassalluzzo |
| 0:2015cv01911 |
| April 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeffrey J. Keyes |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
302
ORDER denying 283 Motion for Further Consideration of Sealing. Order on continued sealing becomes final on 4/26/2018 unless further timely submissions are filed.(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 4/5/2018. (MSK)
|
|
Filing
280
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT AND FOR LEAVE TO AMEND denying 229 . (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 1/30/2018. (JMK)
|
|
Filing
224
ORDER granting 160 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 166 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on August 6, 2017. (JMK)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 29 Motion to Lift Discovery Stay and for Expedited Discovery (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 18, 2015. (DML)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
