Radmer v. OS Salesco, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael J. Radmer, Jr.
Defendant: OS Salesco, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2015cv03177
Filed: July 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Becky R. Thorson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER denying 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 03/27/2017. (TLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Radmer v. OS Salesco, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J. Radmer, Jr.
Represented By: Phillip Gainsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OS Salesco, Inc.
Represented By: Ellen A Brinkman
Represented By: Emily M Peterson
Represented By: David A Schooler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?