Perry v. Boston Scientific Family et al
Plaintiff: Donald Perry
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Family, Stein, Boston Scientific Cardiac Rhythm Management and any Future and any Past John Doe and Jane Doe defendants
Case Number: 0:2016cv00137
Filed: January 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's motion for a certificate of appealability 60 is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 61 is GRANTED. The entire $505 filing fee must be paid ove r time in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 3. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and for clarification of report and recommendation on established federal laws 62 is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on February 27, 2017. (CLG)
January 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. See Order for details.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on January 4, 2017. (CLG) (cc: Perry) Modified on 1/4/2017 (AKL).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. Boston Scientific Family et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Represented By: Joseph M Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Family
Represented By: Joseph M Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stein
Represented By: Joseph M Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Cardiac Rhythm Management
Represented By: Joseph M Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: any Future and any Past John Doe and Jane Doe defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?