Boldt v. Northern States Power Company
Plaintiff: Wade Boldt
Defendant: Northern States Power Company
Case Number: 0:2016cv00232
Filed: February 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Goodhue
Presiding Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 05/02/2017. (TLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boldt v. Northern States Power Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northern States Power Company
Represented By: Michael John Moberg
Represented By: Alyssa M Toft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wade Boldt
Represented By: Jenny M Helling
Represented By: Nicholas G B May
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?