Shoemaker v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. et al
| Sandra K. Shoemaker and City of Miami Fire Fighters' & Police Officers' Retirement Trust |
| Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., David L. Martin and Laurence L. Betterley |
| Norfolk County Retirement System, Wayne County Employees' Retirement System, Pompano Beach General Employees' Retirement System and Luzerne County Retirement System |
| 0:2016cv00568 |
| March 4, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Katherine M. Menendez |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 15 U.S.C. § 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 93 ) is GRANTED consistent with the memorandum above. 2. Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 86 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 01/10/2018. (Written Opinion) (las)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 52 ) is GRANTED consistent with the memorandum above. 2. Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 48 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.3. Plaintiffs' request for leave to amend is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within 90 days of the date of this order. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/29/2017. (BJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
