Harrell v. Handi Medical Supply, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tracy Harrell
Defendant: Handi Medical Supply, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2016cv00737
Filed: March 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 17 Handi Medical Supply's Motion for Summary Judgment(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 09/28/2017. (JMK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrell v. Handi Medical Supply, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Harrell
Represented By: Cassie C Navarro
Represented By: Joni M Thome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Handi Medical Supply, Inc.
Represented By: Lee A Lastovich
Represented By: Alyssa M Toft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?