Kunshier v. Dayton et al

Kunshier v. Dayton et al

Case Number:	0:2016cv00792
Filed:	February 21, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
Nature of Suit:	Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 30, 2022	Filing 43 ORDER ACCEPTINGD REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation 42 is ACCEPTED. Petitioner Robert A. Kunshier's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. Kunshier's motions for appointment of counsel 4 35 ar e DENIED. Kunshier's motion to lift stay 34 is DENIED AS MOOT. Kunshier's motion to determine whether the courts have granted ex parte communications to respondents' counsel 38 is GRANTED as explained in the Report and Recommendation. No certificate of appealability shall issue. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 12/30/2022.(RMM)
February 21, 2019	Filing 25 ORDER denying 22 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 2/21/2019. (RMM)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 30, 2022

Filing 43 ORDER ACCEPTINGD REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation 42 is ACCEPTED. Petitioner Robert A. Kunshier's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. Kunshier's motions for appointment of counsel 4 35 ar e DENIED. Kunshier's motion to lift stay 34 is DENIED AS MOOT. Kunshier's motion to determine whether the courts have granted ex parte communications to respondents' counsel 38 is GRANTED as explained in the Report and Recommendation. No certificate of appealability shall issue. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 12/30/2022.(RMM)

February 21, 2019

Filing 25 ORDER denying 22 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 2/21/2019. (RMM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kunshier v. Dayton et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?