PNY Technologies Inc. v. Polaroid Corporation
PNY Technologies Inc. |
Polaroid Corporation |
0:2016cv01357 |
May 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
John R. Tunheim |
Appeal |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER affirming the May 5, 2016, order of the Bankruptcy Court (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on March 29, 2017. (DML) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PNY Technologies Inc. v. Polaroid Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: PNY Technologies Inc. | |
Represented By: | David J Adler |
Represented By: | Robert T Kugler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: Polaroid Corporation | |
Represented By: | Ralph V Mitchell, Jr |
Represented By: | John R Stoebner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.