Haddley v. Next Chapter Technology, Inc. et al
| Neil Leonard Haddley |
| Vaughn Mulcrone, Next Chapter Technology, Inc., dataBridge, LLC, County of Kittson, Minnesota, County of Mahnomen, Minnesota, County of Marshall, Minnesota, County of Norman, Minnesota, County of Polk, Minnesota, County of Red Lake, Minnesota, County of Roseau, Minnesota, County of Kandiyohi, Minnesota, County of Rice, Minnesota, County of Scott, Minnesota, County of Stearns, Minnesota, County of Washington, Minnesota, County of Becker, Minnesota, County of Clay, Minnesota, County of Dodge, Minnesota, County of Isanti, Minnesota, County of Otter Tail, Minnesota, County of Mower, Minnesota, County of Steele, Minnesota, County of Waseca, Minnesota and County of Kanabec, Minnesota |
| 0:2016cv01960 |
| June 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Leo I. Brisbois |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
224
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 177 ) is GRANTED and Count II is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 182 ) is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/28/2019. (las)
|
|
Filing
197
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 196 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 103 ) is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/26/2018. (las)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 44 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART consistent with the memorandum above. 2. Count 2 of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 18 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDI CE as to the County Defendantsthe Minnesota counties of Kittson, Mahnomen, Marshall, Norman, Polk, Red Lake, Roseau, Kandiyohi, Rice, Scott, Stearns, Washington, Becker, Clay, Dodge, Isanti, Otter Tail, Mower, Steele, and Waseca. 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate (Doc. No. 51 ) is GRANTED. 4. This matter and Haddley v. Isanti et al., Civil No. 15-2106 (DWF/LIB) are consolidated for all purposes under case number: Civil No. 16-1960 (DWF/LIB). 5. Plaintiff shall file a consolidated compla int for the two matters consistent with this order within thirty days of this order. 6. The caption for Civil No. 16-1960 (DWF/LIB) will remain the same. 7. Upon the filing of the consolidated amended complaint in Civil No. 16-1960 (DWF/LIB), the par ties shall file a dismissal document in Civil No. 15-2106 (DWF/LIB). 8. All pending matters, including discovery, in Civil No. 15-2106 (DWF/LIB) are STAYED unless the parties jointly stipulate to the matters continuing. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/25/2017. (BJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
