Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. DE C.V. et al v. Polymetrix AG
0:2016cv02401 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 870 ORDER OVERRULING in part and SUSTAINING in part 866 Plaintiffs' Objection to Bill of Costs, and GRANTING Defendant $42,846.60 in costs (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 4/5/2021. (avt) |
Filing 869 UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 712 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 760 Plaintff's Motion to Strike Pleading; denying 769 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; overruling 847 Objection to Magistrate Judge's November 12, 2020 Order; affirming 832 Magistrate Judge's Order; denying as moot Plaintiffs' Motions to Strike [19-mc-0092, Doc. No. 71; 20-mc-0007, Doc. No. 83; 20-mc-0015, Doc. No. 68]. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 2/5/2021.(SMD) |
Filing 846 ORDER in Response to 841 Letter to District Judge, 843 Sealed Letter to District Judge. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 11/24/2020. (avt) |
Filing 745 ORDER in Response to 734 Letter to District Judge, 732 Sealed Letter, 724 Letter to District Judge. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 9/15/2020. (MJC) |
Filing 665 ORDER granting 661 UNOPPOSED EXPEDITED MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONERS TO TAKE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER II, ARTICLE 17 OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 7/25/2020. (ERE) |
Filing 660 ORDER denying 655 Plantiffs' APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 7/23/2020. (MJC) |
Filing 590 ORDER overruling 572 Plaintiffs' Objections to Magistrate Judge's March 13, 2020 Order and affirming 569 Magistrate Judge's March 13, 2020 Order. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 4/26/2020. (MR) |
Filing 569 ORDER denying 485 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Defendant's Opinion of Counsel and Related Documents and Communications. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 3/13/2020. (JMK) |
Filing 428 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 416 Motion to Compel. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 5/24/2019. (JMK) |
Filing 418 REDACTED Version of 408 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 145 Defendant Polymetrix's Motion to Dismiss GPT/DAK's Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; denying as moot 399 GPT/DAK's Motion to Strike Improper Argument from Polymetrix's Post-Hearing Reply Brief; and denying as moot 407 GPT/DAK's Request for Leave to File Additional Evidence and a Sur-Reply. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 3/5/2019. (SMD) |
Filing 290 ORDER overruling 286 Third-Party Objection to 275 Magistrate Judge's September 21, 2018 Order, and affirming 275 Magistrate Judge's September 21, 2018 Order. See Order for additional details. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/26/2018. (MJC) |
Filing 264 ORDER in Response to 254 Defendant's Letter to District Judge. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 9/10/2018. (MJC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. DE C.V. et al v. Polymetrix AG | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.