Jackson v. Gutzmer et al
| Ronnie Jerome Jackson, III |
| Jeff Gutzmer, Natalie Liesman, Michelle Smith and Tammy Wherley |
| 0:2016cv03831 |
| November 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| Becky R. Thorson |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiffs' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 95 are OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 94 is ADOPTED.Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 74 is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/27/2019. (JMK)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER denying 102 Motion for Settlement Conference(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 2/20/2019. (TMM)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge 8 ; overruling Plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 10 ; denying Plaintiff's Motion Preliminary Injunction [ 3]; overruling Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 28 ; adopting Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendation 27 ; Consolidating this case with Case No. 16-4393. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 09/19/2017. (JMK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
