Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Corey Smith
Defendant:	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Number:	0:2016cv04277
Filed:	December 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Hildy Bowbeer
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2017	Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, Proposed Paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of the draft agreement shall not be included as part of the materials terms o f the settlement to which the parties agreed. Proposed paragraphs 9.b. and 9.d. reflect the material terms of the settlement and shall be included in the final agreement. Proposed paragraph 10 shall not be included in the final agreement because the nondisclosure provisions of the agreement, together with the rules of evidence in both state and federal courts that makecompromise offers inadmissible except for limited purposes, see, e.g., Fed. R. Evid. 408, adequately implement the terms of the settlement. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/20/17. (KMW)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2017

Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, Proposed Paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of the draft agreement shall not be included as part of the materials terms o f the settlement to which the parties agreed. Proposed paragraphs 9.b. and 9.d. reflect the material terms of the settlement and shall be included in the final agreement. Proposed paragraph 10 shall not be included in the final agreement because the nondisclosure provisions of the agreement, together with the rules of evidence in both state and federal courts that makecompromise offers inadmissible except for limited purposes, see, e.g., Fed. R. Evid. 408, adequately implement the terms of the settlement. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/20/17. (KMW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corey Smith
Represented By:	Richard A Dahl
Represented By:	Kyle Kosieracki
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Represented By:	Angela Beranek Brandt
Represented By:	Stephanie L Chandler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?