Wefelmeyer v. Bloomington Hooters, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kayla Wefelmeyer
Defendant: Bloomington Hooters, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2017cv00172
Filed: January 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Presiding Judge: Katherine M. Menendez
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING 38 Report and Recommendation; dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 8/22/17. (KLL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wefelmeyer v. Bloomington Hooters, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kayla Wefelmeyer
Represented By: Gerald T Laurie
Represented By: Ian S Laurie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomington Hooters, Inc.
Represented By: Gina K Janeiro
Represented By: Jennifer A Nodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?