Watso et al v. Piper et al
| Kimberly Watso and Kaleen Dietrich |
| Emily Piper, Scott County, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, John E. Jacobson, Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Tribal Court of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Mary Ringhand, Isaac Hall, Donald Perkins and Tribal Court of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community |
| 0:2017cv00562 |
| February 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Scott |
| Katherine M. Menendez |
| Ann D. Montgomery |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 117 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Plaintiffs' Objections 119 are Overruled; granting 46 Motion to Dismiss Scott County, granting 29 Motion to Dismiss filed by Emily Piper, granting 12 Motion to D ismiss filed by John E. Jacobson, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, Tribal Court of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community, denying as moot 103 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Kimberly Watso, Kaleen Dietrich, gran ting 53 Motion to Dismiss filed by Tribal Court of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Mary Ringhand. The Complaint 1 is dismissed (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 3/27/2018. (TLU)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
