Wells v. Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railway Co. et al
| James R. Wells |
| Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railway Co. and Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. |
| 0:2017cv00807 |
| March 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Anoka |
| Steven E. Rau |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER: Defendant BNSF's second motion to dismiss [ECF No. 25 ] is DENIED as moot. Defendant BNSF's third motion to dismiss [ECF No. 53 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff Wells' request for leave to amend his Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Plaintiff Wells' Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 52 ] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 16, 2017. (CBC)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER: BNSF Railway's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [Docket No. 9 ] is DENIED as moot. If Wells intends to amend his First Amended Complaint, he shall, within 14 days of the date of this Order, serve and file either (1) a Second Amended Complaint, if BNSF Railway consents in writing to the amendment, or (2) a motion to amend. The hearing on July 25, 2017, at 11 a.m. is CANCELLED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 7, 2017. (CBC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
