MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Maverick Cutting and Breaking LLC
| MCI Communications Services, Inc. and MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC |
| Maverick Cutting and Breaking LLC |
| 0:2017cv01117 |
| April 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Steven E. Rau |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Steven M. Hamilton; granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and Rental Cost Documentation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 3/12/2019. (JMK)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER; denying 34 MCI's Objection to Magistrate Judge Rau's Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to File Amended Complaint and Add a Party Based on Newly Discovered Evidence. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 9/24/2018. (JMK)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER denying 23 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 6/15/2018. (EMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
