Lopez v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC et al
| Anastacio Lemus Lopez |
| Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC, Minnesota Vikings Football Stadium, LLC, Monterrey Security Consultants, Inc., Andrew Hodynsky, Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority, SMG, Janee Harteau, City of Minneapolis, Russell Cragin, Anthony Rodin, Michael Grahn, Angelo Fossum, Stephen McCarty and Gerald Moore |
| 0:2017cv01179 |
| April 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard H. Kyle |
| Katherine M. Menendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
283
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 242 is GRANTED; and 2. Defendants' Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony 245 250 256 are DENIED as moot. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 5/23/2019. (LLM)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER granting 189 Motion to Compel and striking 190 hearing on motion. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 8/20/2018. (EB)
|
|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The County's Motion to Dismiss 140 is GRANTED; and 2. The Amended Complaint 93 is DISMISSED with prejudice against Defendants Hennepin County, David J. Hough, Michael O. Freeman, and Richard W. Stanek. (Written Opinion) Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 6/12/2018. (LLM)
|
|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. MSFA's Motion to Dismiss 96 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Count VII of the Amended Complaint 93 is DISMISSED with prejudice against MSFA; and 3. Counts XIII and XIV of the Amended Complaint 93 are DISMISSED without prejudice against MSFA. (Written Opinion) Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 01/30/2018. (LLM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
