Smith v. Roy
Petitioner: Joshua Smith
Respondent: Tom Roy
Case Number: 0:2017cv01347
Filed: April 25, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Rice
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's July 16, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16 ) is ADOPTED. Joshua Smith-Bey's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. No. 1 ) is DENIED. No certificate of appealability will be issued. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 8/20/2018. (las) cc: Smith. (kt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joshua Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tom Roy
Represented By: James P Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?