Brown v. Global CashSpot Corp.
Jeffry Brown |
Global CashSpot Corp. |
0:2017cv01348 |
April 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
David T. Schultz |
John R. Tunheim |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 13 Motion to Transfer/Change Venue filed by Global CashSpot Corp. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on August 1, 2017. (HAZ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown v. Global CashSpot Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Global CashSpot Corp. | |
Represented By: | Alex M. Hagstrom |
Represented By: | Justin H Jenkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffry Brown | |
Represented By: | Steven E Ness |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.