Kosko v. SYSCO Corporation et al
Ashley Kosko |
SYSCO North Dakota, Inc., James Joy and SYSCO Corporation |
0:2017cv01447 |
May 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Beltrami |
Leo I Brisbois |
John R Tunheim |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(AKL) |
Filing 24 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on August 15, 2017. (HAZ) |
Filing 23 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #22 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Kornblit, Michelle) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Ashley Kosko. Jointly Signed by SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc., and James Joy. (Kornblit, Michelle) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Settlement by James Joy, SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER: James Joy answer due 6/29/2017; SYSCO Corporation answer due 6/27/2017; SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. answer due 6/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 6/22/2017. (KNK) |
Filing 19 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #18 Stipulation. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by James Joy, SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Ashley Kosko. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 17 ORDER that Defendants SYSCO Corporation and SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. shall have an extension of time up to and including June 20, 2017, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, and that Defendant James Joy shall have an extension of time up to and including June 22, 2017, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court hereby grants the stipulated extension. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 6/7/17. (kt) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PROPOSED ORDER by James Joy, SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. re #15 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Ashley Kosko. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Dustin M. Dow for SYSCO Corporation and SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 5/26/17. (MAM) |
Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Gregory V. Mersol for SYSCO Corporation, and SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 5/26/17. (MAM) |
Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Jeffrey R. Vlasek for SYSCO Corporation, and SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 5/26/17. (MAM) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Dustin Dow. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-5527909 filed by SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc.. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gregory Mersol. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-5527897 filed by SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc.. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jeffrey Vlasek. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-5527876 filed by SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc.. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER re #5 Stipulation: James Joy answer due 6/8/2017; SYSCO Corporation answer due 6/8/2017; SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. answer due 6/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 5/24/2017. (lmb) |
Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Jeffrey Vlasek; Dustin Dow; Gregory Mersol as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (AKL) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PROPOSED ORDER by SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. re #5 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Ashley Kosko. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to James Joy, SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc.. Corrected deft's name to read: SYSCO. (KNK) Modified on 5/8/2017 (KNK). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to James Joy, Sysco Corporation, Sysco North Dakota, Inc.. (KNK) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 6th - Civil Rights List and referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 17-cv-1447 (JRT/LIB). (KNK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Joy, SYSCO Corporation, SYSCO North Dakota, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AMNDC-5477770.) filed by Ashley Kosko. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kornblit, Michelle) Modified on 5/8/2017 (KNK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.