Doe v. Zinke
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Ryan K. Zinke
Case Number: 0:2017cv02017
Filed: June 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting 51 Defendant David Bernhardt's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 10/31/2019. (RMM)
March 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER adopting 28 Report and Recommendation; denying 13 Motion to Dismiss. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 3/7/2018. (SMD) cc: Jane Doe. Modified text on 3/7/2018 (JDF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Zinke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan K. Zinke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?