Patterson v. Kintu et al
| Honora Tremaine Patterson |
| Emmanual Kintu, Nick Dechene, Dan Meyer, Steve McCarty, John Doe and Tim Demolling |
| 0:2017cv02263 |
| June 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| David S. Doty |
| Becky R. Thorson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER granting 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 108 Report and Recommendation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 2/27/2019. (DLO)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 92 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 92 Motion for TRO; denying 92 Motion to Appoint Counsel; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 95 Report and Recommendation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 8/24/2018. (DLO)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 61 Motion for Discovery(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 7/10/2018. (TMM)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 54 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 4/16/2018. (TMM)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 31 Partial Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 49 Report and Recommendation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 2/12/2018. (DLO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
