Larson et al v. Lake et al
| Guy I. Greene |
| Kelly Lake, Carlton County Jail, Paul Coughlin, Brian Belich, Dave Kamunen, Jason Wilmes, Cammi Werner, Travis Warnygora, John Does, Jane Does and Tom Roy |
| 0:2017cv03551 |
| July 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Carlton |
| Katherine M. Menendez |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 124 (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 9/4/2019. Based on all the files, records, and proceedings here, the Court ACCEPTS as modified the R&R 124 . Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defen dants' Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively for Summary Judgment 98 is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent they seek injunctive relief. Plaintiffs' claims against Carlton County Jail are SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiffs' claims against Carlton County Sheriff Kelly Lake, Deputy Sheriff Brian Belich, Jail Sergeant Jason Wilmes, Jail Sergeant Dave Kamunen, Cammi Werner, and Travis Warnygora are DI SMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Greene's Free Exercise and Equal Protection religious claims against Jail Administrator Paul Coughlin are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' remaining claims against Jail Administrator Paul Coughlin are DISMISS ED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' Intentional Infliction of Emotion Distress and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' claims against all unknown numbers of John Does and Jane Does are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's request for appointment of a medical/psychological expert and for appointment of counsel is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED. (KMW)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER denying 92 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 97 Motion to Reopen Discovery and to Change the Pretrial Scheduling Order (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 1/22/2019. (SGK)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 84 Motion (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 9/25/2018. (TMA)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER in Response to 79 Letter to District Judge requesting appointment of counsel. Mr. Greene's request for appointment of counsel is denied.(Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 8/1/2018. (BJP)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER denying 71 Motion for TRO; adopting 76 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 7/30/2018. (SMD) cc: Larson and Greene. (kt)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 54 Motion to amend the complaint; granting 55 Application of Hollis Larson to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs; denying 60 Motion for payment of fees and costs. See order for details. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 7/9/2018. (BJP)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Certify Class; adopting 47 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 6/25/2018. (SMD)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 63 Letter to District Judge, 64 Letter to District Judge.(Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/4/2018. (BJP)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendation; dismissing defendant Carlton County Jail from this action. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/05/2017. (SMD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
