Johnson v. Muy Pizza Minnesota, LLC.
Plaintiff: David John Johnson
Defendant: MUY Pizza Minnesota, LLC.
Case Number: 0:2017cv03649
Filed: August 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Anoka
Presiding Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS overruling plaintiff's objection; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by MUY Pizza Minnesota, LLC; and dismissing this action without prejudice (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 5/16/2018. (HAZ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Muy Pizza Minnesota, LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David John Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MUY Pizza Minnesota, LLC.
Represented By: Alex M. Hagstrom
Represented By: William A McNab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?