Latraille v. Owner of the City of St. Paul, MN

Plaintiff: Samantha Latraille
Defendant: Owner of the City of St. Paul, MN
Case Number: 0:2017cv04207
Filed: September 11, 2017
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Referring Judge: Steven E. Rau
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 6, 2017 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 3 Report and Recommendation; denying 2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 11/6/2017. (DLO) cc: Latraille. Modified text on 11/7/2017 (JDF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Latraille v. Owner of the City of St. Paul, MN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Latraille
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Owner of the City of St. Paul, MN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?