Bajwa v. Chateau Edina Condominium Association, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Manjit Bajwa
Defendant: Roeder Smith Jadin PLLC
Case Number: 0:2017cv04212
Filed: September 11, 2017
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Referring Judge: David T. Schultz
Presiding Judge: Wilhelmina M. Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 13, 2018 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 18 Motion to Enforce Settlement; granting 24 Motion to Enforce Settlement(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 4/13/2018. (KAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bajwa v. Chateau Edina Condominium Association, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manjit Bajwa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roeder Smith Jadin PLLC
Represented By: Michael A Klutho
Represented By: Patrick D Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?