Pitts v. Ramsey County et al
| Herbert Pitts |
| Ramsey County, St. Paul Police Department and (Unknown) |
| 0:2017cv04261 |
| September 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael J. Davis |
| Tony N. Leung |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated June 26, 2019 57 . 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Object to Findings and Recommendation 58 is OVERRULED and his Motion to Appoint Counsel 58 is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration under Local Rule 7.1(j) 49 is DENIED. 4. Plaintiff's requests for a hearing 55 and 56 are DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/30/2019. (GRR)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 35 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Ramsey County's Motion to Dismiss 15 is GRANTED. 2. Defendant St. Paul Police Department's Motion to Dismiss 19 is GRANTED. 3. All Claims against the St. Paul Police Department are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. Any Claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. All remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 6/25/2018. (GRR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
