Bakri v. Bakri
Plaintiff: Amin Richard Bakri
Defendant: Aaron Ibrahim Bakri
Case Number: 0:2017cv04332
Filed: September 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Anoka
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge: Tony N. Leung
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff Amin Richard Bakri's application to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is DENIED AS MOOT. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/16/17. (KMW) cc: Amin Bakri on 11/17/2017 (LPH).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bakri v. Bakri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amin Richard Bakri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Ibrahim Bakri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?