Tate v. Titus

Petitioner: Deontray Vershon Tate
Respondent: Jeff Titus
Case Number: 0:2017cv04594
Filed: October 10, 2017
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Chisago
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Referring Judge: Becky R. Thorson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 31, 2018 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 17 . (1) Petitioner's motion for a stay 19 is DENIED. (2) Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED. (3) A certificate of appealability is DENIED. (4) This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 5/31/2018. (CBC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tate v. Titus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeff Titus
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Brittany D Lawonn
Represented By: Edwin William Stockmeyer, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Deontray Vershon Tate
Represented By: Zachary A Longsdorf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?