Moua v. State of Minnesota

Petitioner: Por Moua
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Case Number: 0:2017cv04600
Filed: October 6, 2017
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Carlton
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Referring Judge: Steven E. Rau
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2017 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be TRANSFERRED to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 12/20/17. (KMW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moua v. State of Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Por Moua
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Represented By: Peter R Marker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?