Mohamed v. Secretary Homeland Security et al
| Awil Mohamed |
| Secretary Homeland Security, Jefferson Sessions, Scott Baniecke and Kurt Freitag |
| 0:2017cv05055 |
| November 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Freeborn |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| David T. Schultz |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Respondents Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions, United States Attorney General, and Peter Berg, Acting ICE Field Office Director's objections (Doc . No. 12 ) to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultzs March 23, 2018 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz's March 23, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11 ) is ADOPTED. Petitioner's Petition for Wr it of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1 ) is GRANTED as follows: a. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, ICE shall hold a bond hearing or release Petitioner from custody on such terms and conditions as it deems necessary to protect the commun ity and ensure Petitioners appearance; and b. In the event ICE does not conduct a bond hearing within thirty (30) days of this order, a Writ of Habeas Corpus shall issue immediately compelling Petitioners unconditional release(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 5/25/2018. (las)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
