Munt v. Roy et al
Joel Marvin Munt |
Tom Roy, Mike Warner and David Coward |
0:2017cv05215 |
November 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Washington |
Steven E. Rau |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 ORDER granting 86 Application on Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 2/4/2019. (SMD) |
Filing 83 ORDER denying 33 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike; denying 3 Plaintiff's First Motion for TRO; denying 38 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Court Action; adopting 58 Report and Recommendation of June 25, 2018, as modified; denying [ 65] Plaintiff's Fourth Motion for TRO; adopting 69 Report and Recommendation of October 15, 2018; denying 42 Plaintiff's Request for Return of Documents; denying 17 Plaintiff's Second Motion for TRO; overruling 61 Plaintiff 9;s Objections to June 25, 2018 Report and Recommendation; overruling 71 Plaintiff's Objections to October 15, 2018 Report and Recommendation; and granting 22 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/10/2019. (MJC) |
Filing 56 ORDER denying 48 Application on Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 6/18/2018. (SMD) |
Filing 43 ORDER denying 7 Expedited Motion to Recuse filed by Plaintiff Joel Marvin Munt. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 5/3/2018.(NAW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.