Collins v. Schmidt
Plaintiff: Desiree Collins
Defendant: Thaddeus P. Schmidt
Case Number: 0:2017cv05369
Filed: December 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Becky R. Thorson
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Denying 14 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 8/9/2018. (JMK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desiree Collins
Represented By: Kathryn H Bennett
Represented By: Robert Bennett
Represented By: Andrew J Noel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thaddeus P. Schmidt
Represented By: Cheri M Sisk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?