Ali v. Nielsen

Plaintiff: Farass Adnan Ali
Defendant: Kristen Nielsen
Case Number: 0:2018cv00053
Filed: January 8, 2018
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Sherburne
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Referring Judge: David T. Schultz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2018 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz's February 28, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4 ) is ADOPTED. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/28/2018. (las)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ali v. Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Farass Adnan Ali
Represented By: John Stevens Connolly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kristen Nielsen
Represented By: Ann M Bildtsen
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?