Ascente Business Consulting, LLC v. DR myCommerce et al
Ascente Business Consulting, LLC |
DR myCommerce and Digital River, Inc. |
0:2018cv00138 |
January 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joan N. Ericksen |
Katherine M. Menendez |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 141 ORDER granting 132 Joint Motion Regarding Continued Sealing and granting 133 Joint Motion Regarding Continued Sealing as modified by the parties' joint letter dated 3/16/2020. Permanent Sealing GRANTED for Document Number(s): 99, 100, 10 2, 104, 123, 123-1, 123-2, 123-3, 123-4, and 130.Document Number(s) to be UNSEALED: 106, 123-5, 123-7, and 123-8. Order on continued sealing becomes final on 4/29/2020 unless further timely submissions are filed.(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 4/1/2020. (BJP) |
Filing 69 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 4/8/2019. (BJP) |
Filing 36 ORDER: (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 18 ] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (2) The Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's second, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh claims. Those claims are DISMISSED. (3) The Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's first and third claims, as set forth in this Order. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 7/26/2018. (CBC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.