Ruddy v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Ruddy
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Case Number: 0:2018cv00241
Filed: January 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M. Menendez
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 (Written Opinion). Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 12 is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 9/6/2019. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruddy v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Ruddy
Represented By: Jennifer G Mrozik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?