Amano-McGann, Inc. v. Lammer et al

Plaintiff: Amano-McGann, Inc.
Defendant: Edward Lammer and Associated Time & Parking Controls, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2018cv00391
Filed: February 9, 2018
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Referring Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amano-McGann, Inc. v. Lammer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amano-McGann, Inc.
Represented By: Peter C Hennigan
Represented By: Jonathan S Parritz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Lammer
Represented By: Thomas F Berndt
Represented By: Randall Tietjen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Associated Time & Parking Controls, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas F Berndt
Represented By: Randall Tietjen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?