Elliott v. Paul

Petitioner: Jacob Elliott
Respondent: David Paul
Case Number: 0:2018cv00403
Filed: February 12, 2018
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Olmsted
Referring Judge: Katherine M. Menendez
Presiding Judge: Wilhelmina M. Wright
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order 25 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 24 (Written Opinion). The Report and Recommendation 24 is ACCEPTED. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 1 is DENIED. 3.The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 12/20/2018. (KMW) cc: Jacob Elliott. Modified text on 12/21/2018 (JLB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elliott v. Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jacob Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Paul
Represented By: Ann M Bildtsen
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?