Fredin v. Clysdale et al
Brock Fredin |
Elizabeth A. Clysdale, David E. McCabe, Grace Elizabeth Miller, Catherine Marie Schaefer and Lindsey Middlecamp |
0:2018cv00510 |
February 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Franklin L. Noel |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 ORDER in Response to 126 Letter to Magistrate Judge re: IFP Status. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 5/3/2019. (SMD) |
Filing 122 ORDER granting 117 Application on Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal; denying 121 letter request for transcripts. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 4/3/2019. (SMD) |
Filing 113 ORDER adopting 106 Report and Recommendation: Plaintiff Brock Fredin's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 80] is GRANTED; The Clerk's Office shall file and docket on Fredin's behalf the Second Amended Complai nt, currently designated as a proposed second amended complaint [Doc. No. 80-1]; Plaintiff Brock Fredin's letter request for leave to file a third amended complaint [Doc. No. 89] is DENIED; Defendant Referee Elizabeth Clysdale's Motion to D ismiss [Doc. No. 38], as applied to the now operative Second Amended Complaint, is GRANTED, and all claims against Referee Clysdale are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Defendants Grace Elizabeth Miller, Catherine Marie Schaefer, and Lindsey Middlecamp' ;s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 44], as applied to the now operative Second Amended Complaint, is GRANTED, and all claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and Defendant Sergeant David E. McCabe's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 49], as applied to the now operative Second Amended Complaint, is GRANTED, as follows: a. Summary judgment is awarded on the search warrant-based retaliation claim in Count 1 of the SAC and on the Franks-based Fourth Amendment claim in Count 2 of the SAC; and b. All remaining claims against Sergeant McCabe are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 2/21/2019. (SMD) |
Filing 107 ORDER adopting 106 Report and Recommendation: Plaintiff Brock Fredin's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 80] is GRANTED; The Clerk's Office shall file and docket on Fredin's behalf the Second Amended Compl aint, currently designated as a proposed second amended complaint [Doc. No. 80-1]; Plaintiff Brock Fredin's letter request for leave to file a third amended complaint [Doc. No. 89] is DENIED; Defendant Referee Elizabeth Clysdale's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 38], as applied to the now operative Second Amended Complaint, is GRANTED, and all claims against Referee Clysdale are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Defendants Grace Elizabeth Miller, Catherine Marie Schaefer, and Lindsey Middlecamp 39;s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 44], as applied to the now operative Second Amended Complaint, is GRANTED, and all claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and Defendant Sergeant David E. McCabe's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No . 49], as applied to the now operative Second Amended Complaint, is GRANTED, as follows: a. Summary judgment is awarded on the search warrant-based retaliation claim in Count 1 of the SAC and on the Franks-based Fourth Amendment claim in Count 2 of the SAC; and b. All remaining claims against Sergeant McCabe are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/10/2019. (SMD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.