U.S. Bank National Association v. Community Treatment Center, Inc.
U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank National Association doing business as U.S. Bank Equipment Finance |
Community Treatment Center, Inc. |
0:2018cv00982 |
April 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Lyon |
Tony N Leung |
Patrick J Schiltz |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd, 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 18-cv-982 PJS/TNL. (JDF) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Community Treatment Center, Inc.. (Van Tassel, Dawn) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Transfer/Change Venue filed by Community Treatment Center, Inc.. (Van Tassel, Dawn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lyon County District Court, (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6056840) filed by Community Treatment Center, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Van Tassel, Dawn) Modified text on 4/11/2018 (JDF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.