Shields-Nordness v. Galindo et al
| Emma Shields-Nordness |
| Oscar Galindo, Jeffrey Korus, Vosinick Kellum, City of Saint Paul, the, John Does and Ramsey County |
| 0:2018cv01426 |
| May 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Patrick J. Schiltz |
| David T. Schultz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Ramsey County defendants' motion to dismiss 25 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Coun ts II and III, and those counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to Count V. 3. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend her complaint to plead a § 1983 claim against Ramsey County premised on t he claim that a policy or custom of Ramsey County caused ADC employees to subject her to a strip search and transfer her to the general population in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 3/1/2019. (CLG)
|
|
Filing
40
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz: granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Stay; Motion Hearing held on 9/12/2018 re 30 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Ramsey County, John Does. (KAR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
