Ivey et al v Johnston
| Christopher Ivey and Eugene Banks |
| Nancy Johnston |
| 0:2018cv01429 |
| May 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Pine |
| Paul A. Magnuson |
| David T. Schultz |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 78 is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 89 is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 1/13/2021. (LLM)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge 61 is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 18 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 3. To the extent Plaintiffs' claims arise u nder the Minnesota state constitution, those claims are DISMISSED; 4. Plaintiff Banks is DISMISSED as a plaintiff in this action; and 5. All claims against Defendant Johnston in her personal capacity are DISMISSED. (Written Opinion) Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 8/23/2019. (LLM)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge 40 is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction 11 is DENIED. (Written Opinion) LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 11/05/2018. (LLM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
