Washington v. Craane et al
| Keith Eugene Washington |
| Stephen Joseph Craane, Deborah Ann MacNeill, Lon Joseph Augdahl, Diane Medchill, Kathy Reid, David Reishus, Nan Larson and Jane Does |
| 0:2018cv01464 |
| May 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Tony N. Leung |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung's Report and Recommendation dated March 9, 2020 (Doc. No. 70 ) is ADOPTED. The Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Stephen Craane, M.D.,Deborah MacNeill, M.D., and Lon Augdahl, M.D. (Doc. No. 46 ) is GRANTED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/31/2020. (las)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung's April 18, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 38 ) is ADOPTED. The motion to dismiss of defendants Diane Medchill, Kathy Reid, David Reishus, and Nan Larson (Doc. No. 20 ) is GRANTED. Defendants Medchill, Reid, Reishus, and Larson are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this action. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 5/16/2019. (las)
|
|
Filing
27
BRIEFING ORDER (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 12/13/2018. (JRE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
